User talk:Dimitridobrasil

Welcome!

Hello, Dimitridobrasil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma

Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy forbids the insertion of original research in articles, unless it is backed up by concrete, reputable sources. In your case, as you are contradicting reputable sources, you need to provide direct sources of your own. But this matter is best discussed in the article's talk page. Loom91 18:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, please end all talk page posts with ~~~~, which will automatically add a signature and timestamp to your post. Secondly, take a look at the basic Wikipedia content policies: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. The paper you are citing does not argue your point. It argues quite a different point, which you are claiming supports your point. Unfortunately, an ordinary reader has no way of verifying whether this is true. For this reason, we can not allow any but the most obvious of arguments on Wikipedia articles. It is our job to report published knowledge, not create it. You need to cite literature that argues the very point you ae trying to make, that iterated prisoner's dilemma repeated a known number of times does not necessarily lead to defect on all rounds. Loom91 07:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]