User talk:Djmaschek/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of M1841 6-pounder field gun
The article M1841 6-pounder field gun you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:M1841 6-pounder field gun for comments about the article, and Talk:M1841 6-pounder field gun/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 22:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
First Battle of Boulou
I have assessed as B class. I did not think it critical to the assessment but is the name of representative on mission known? I suppose that it might not have been in the source or there might have been more than one and the specific person was unidentified? Donner60 (talk) 08:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Each army had representatives-on-mission assigned. I thought it was two per army, but the source listed Fabre, Gaston, and Cassanyes during the period covered. So, I don't know why there are three mentioned and the source (Phipps) did not explain. When Dagobert complained to the Committee of Public Safety, he specifically mentioned Fabre and Gaston (source: Cust). In early 1794, they were all replaced by two, Milhaud and Soubrany (source: Phipps). Thanks for reviewing the article. Djmaschek (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)