User talk:DrPlum

Welcome!

Hello, DrPlum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Protandim have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cresix (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Protandim, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 17:25, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no medical liability because it does not offer medical advice. Read WP:MEDICAL, and please stop adding advice in articles. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Protandim. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cresix (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Plum, you need to back off and discuss this on the article's talk page. -- Brangifer (talk) 18:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are a single purpose account currently engaged in edit warring. If you revert one more time you will be blocked from editing. Do you understand that?

Your recent editing history at Protandim shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Cresix (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cresix obviously work for Lifevantage company and gets paid to remove links, even the internal links in wikipedia. Cresix only wants the company information posted, because he works for the company. I see no room for any discussion. Editor assistance/Requests is the only resolution that is possible. DrPlum (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 02:48, 27 May 2012 (UTC) Company's make all attempts to control media sites, clog the internet with their PR and, pay people to monitor the information, this is what you doDrPlum (talk) 12:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cresix (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC) Working for Lifeventage is a bad thing, I don't know you tell meDrPlum (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Cresix (talk) 14:16, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, do you understand that you can be blocked for this policy violation. False accusations about another editor can be considered defamatory and a personal attack. Do you understand that if you do so again you will be blocked? Cresix (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]