User talk:Dsc~enwiki
"Dear Zilog Jones, Do you really think that your contribution
"There is a hole in the centre of the disc, usually used by a some form of clamp or clip device within the player to hold it in place and allow it to be rotated by a motor. The diameter of the hole is 15mm - coincidentally the same size as a Dutch 10 cent coin."
will add to the value of the CD article? Specifically, your remark regarding the fact that the diameter is 15 mm, which is the size of a Dutch coin. Why is this so important? Each and every size has been used somewhere, so it is not difficult to relate anything with anything. Is there something of historical relevance in this fact? If so, please add, otherwise this 'fact' can better be removed. Dsc 16:43, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)"
- Someone mentioned earlier in the CD discussion page that the hole was based on the size of a dutch coin, but wasn't sure which one. And as you may know, Philips are a dutch company! AFAIK they had a lot of input with the design of the disc, especially since Sony and other Japanese companies were originally planning on using 30cm optical discs for audio. From what I know it was Philips who put forward the 12cm format, so it's likely they designed it.
- Also, there was no mention of the hole in the centre before - the dimensions of it, or its purpose. I don't know if there truly is a relationship between the hole and a dutch 10 cent coin, but it's possible. --Zilog Jones 17:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The diameter of the center hole is irrelevant for Wikipedia. It has no effect on the playing time or other key parameters of the CD and DVD. The possible relationship with the Dutch coin is coincidental. In the same way as you did, I could write that CD's outer diameter, 12 cm, is the same as that of the Heineken beermat (coaster). And as you may know, Philips and Heineken are Dutch companies! So my conclusion, let us stop listing trivialties in wikipedia, so pls remove both your contributions regarding the center hole and the dutch coin. Dsc 05:46, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- OK, but the diameter and purpose of the hole is still relevant, just like the diameter of the disc itself and other physical parameters which were already mentioned. --Zilog Jones 20:55, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
OK. Could you explain why the hole diameter is relevant for wikipedia. As said the playing time is not affected by the choice of the diameter. The playing time (and thus capacity) is determined by the inner diameter program area, which equals 50 mm (more than three times larger than the inner hole diamter, 15 mm). Dsc 09:43, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hello, I want to mention that the size of the (pre Euro) Dutch 10 cent coin and the size of the CD hole is NOT coincidence. It is a fact that Philips used this size. And yes, I think it is important for Wikipedia, because it is historical, besides, it is an intresting fact, that alone is an reason to mention. Marius
Hello also, I would wish to add my sincere appreciation for the revealing insight of the correlation between the 15 mm CD center hole and the pre-Euro Dutch 10 cent coin. I have looked extensively for reasoning behind the 15mm CD hole size with no avail - until now. So, Thank You Zilog Jones for this truly unique and valuable 15mm CD hole size reasoning info. [I am new here] RW 23:23, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
DualDisc article needs your help!
[edit]Hi Dsc,
Could you please read this and give us your opinion. Possibly reverting the article if necessary.
Thanks
Cedars 09:43, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
DualDisc FAC
[edit]Hey Dsc. Thanks for all your feedback on the article. The nomination for Featured Article failed the first time around, but I have re-submitted it as an FAC. I was wondering if you'd consider supporting it? Cheers! --K1vsr (talk) 15:45, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
The matter of Dr. James R. Russell's article
[edit]Hi there. I wrote Professor/Dr. James R. Russell's article as he is indeed a world known scholar in his field and very notable. I checked that his colleague, Dr. Wheeler Thackston had an article, which he has since 2004. They are both in the same department at Harvard, and on comparable par. Dr. Russell's opus "Zoroastrianism in Armenia" is a major work published by Harvard University amongst other works of his. The article is not a vanity article and Dr. Russell who occupies the Mashtots Chair in Armenian Studies, at Harvard University, which is a very prestigious chair, is more than noteworthy. As much as Dr. Wheeler Thackston is. Dr. Russell's article is James R. Russell. Thanks for your attention. Please remove the warning from the article. Thanks. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc 20:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Dsc, I noticed you reverted me on James R. Russell with the edit comment "rm vandalism". My edit most certainly was not vandalism. I looked at your comments and reviewed the article and agreed with Wikiklrsc that the banner was not needed. I think it would be better to discuss this on the talk page rather than getting into any kind of dispute. Perhaps you could expand on why you feel this is a vanity page there? Thanks -- sannse (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dsc. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dsc~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
12:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)