User talk:Easily ruined
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Easily ruined (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please point to where any one of my accounts have been used abusively. I have genuine reasons for using multiple accounts. Why were these not asked for? Why was a CheckUser performed in private without leaving a log? Please point to any vandalism. Please point to a single edit that is against your policy. Please point to an edit that wasn't productive.
Decline reason:
Checkuser-confirmed abuser of multiple accounts. User should request unblocking from ArbCom or post a correct request at User talk:ColouredSpots. TNXMan 18:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Creating an illusion of support
No
- Circumventing policies or sanctions
No
- Avoiding scrutiny
Second opinion requested See also legitimate uses
- "Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts
No
- Role accounts
No
- Deceptively seeking positions of community trust
No
- Administrators with multiple accounts
No
- Posing as a neutral commentator
No
- Voting more than once in polls
No
- Misusing new pages patrol
No
- Strawman socks
No
- Editing logged out in order to mislead
No
I smell a bad block. Easily ruined (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)