Jump to content

User talk:Easily ruined

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easily ruined (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please point to where any one of my accounts have been used abusively. I have genuine reasons for using multiple accounts. Why were these not asked for? Why was a CheckUser performed in private without leaving a log? Please point to any vandalism. Please point to a single edit that is against your policy. Please point to an edit that wasn't productive.

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed abuser of multiple accounts. User should request unblocking from ArbCom or post a correct request at User talk:ColouredSpots. TNXMan 18:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Creating an illusion of support  No
  • Circumventing policies or sanctions  No
  • Avoiding scrutiny  Second opinion requested See also legitimate uses
  • "Good hand" and "bad hand" accounts  No
  • Role accounts  No
  • Deceptively seeking positions of community trust  No
  • Administrators with multiple accounts  No
  • Posing as a neutral commentator  No
  • Voting more than once in polls  No
  • Misusing new pages patrol  No
  • Strawman socks  No
  • Editing logged out in order to mislead  No

I smell a bad block. Easily ruined (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]