User talk:EatYerGreens

Welcome!

Hello, EatYerGreens, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bob talk 11:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bob, thanks for dropping by. I've only just worked out where you found my ID from. EatYerGreens (talk) 00:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Black Adder

"humorous" is correct English spelling per the Oxford English Dictionary, otherwise I wouldn't have passed this as a Good Article. Thanks. --Rodhull andemu 00:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rod, I could kick myself! EatYerGreens (talk) 00:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:British_Airways_Flight_38#AAIB_Special_Bulletin_S1-2008

I agree with your comments about the number of WP rules. Bear in mind that a sizeable number of irresponsible editors don't observe the policies and guidelines and leave it for everyone else to clear up after them. So please don't feel you have to understand the policies. These are the only things that you need to read - not to memorise, but to be aware of -

Policies -

Style guideline -

WP:Manual of style

Don't get drawn into reading the related articles because, as you've already found, there's too many. The editing code techniques you pick up by seeing what others have done when you edit the articles. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 10:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip, John. I was commenting about the way the guides are full of "unintroduced abbreviations", as I call them, or jargon. I have to chase the links to find out what these mean or else the sentence in which they appear doesn't make much sense. When the linked page contains yet more jargon... and so on, ad nauseam. EatYerGreens (talk) 00:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sudan Airways Flight 109

from WP:MOS - Avoid contested vocabulary

Words and phrases like thusly, overly, whilst, amongst, as per, refute in the sense of dispute, along with several others, should be avoided because they are not widely accepted—at least in some of their applications. Some are regional, so unsuitable in an international encyclopedia (see National varieties of English below). Some give an impression of "straining for formality", and therefore of an insecure grasp of English. See List of English words with disputed usage, Words to avoid, and List of frequently misused English words; see also Identity and Gender-neutral language below. 76.19.101.108 (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not fussed about the word used in the article. Your edit summary said "whilst?" please. You could easily have said WP:MOS - Avoid contested vocabulary instead and I would have happily looked it up for myself and seen my error (writing in my own *ing language!) See WP:BITE EatYerGreens (talk) 02:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to take it personally. See WP:OWN. FWIW, I think we're speaking the same *ing language! :) 76.19.101.108 (talk) 03:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't take it personally. This edit appears to show it was another editor who created that para (by all means write to them about it). All I did was a revert, on the basis that the paragraph was originally drafted using the British style and I'd read somewhere that it's normal to respect US/Brit spelling styles that are already in place in an article, regardless of personal preference. Finally, if you note how few my contributions to the article are, relative to the other editors, in what sense do you think that I think that I own it? EatYerGreens (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't tallied up your number of edits versus all or any of the other editors, but given your speedy revert of my edit and use of "*ing" in this discussion, you certainly seem to be emotionally invested in this article. Given the available evidence, I concluded --> WP:OWN. 76.19.101.108 (talk) 11:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time team episodes

Hiya,

I am goign to reply to all your comments but i do not have time jsut now it might be this weekend befor eig et back to you, i thought i leave you a message so you know i will be replying and giving comments. I will also try draw up the way i like the list ot be but its only a suggestion. I also think the lvie episode deserver there own article as there notable i do not believ ethey should be part of the main article for one the epiosde count does not match up with the producers this way but again i will comment soon :). In case you think i just want the article the way i want it i do not i jsut want the article to be more presentable and easier for other to understand and come ot like sometihng i like, a exmaple of how i like to do it eventally is List of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition episodes--Andrewcrawford (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your work in progress

Hi, just to let you know, your work in progress page contained live categories and interwiki links. As a draft page, these should not be included, as it can mess up the categories; I inserted a colon here to unlink them. Cheers QueenCake (talk) 20:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I had not realised that these would create a problem. Also, apolologies for the delayed response. EatYerGreens (talk) 10:07, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonfly image page suggestion

Hi. I read your comments at the UK dragonfly lists's talk page. There's another Wikimedia project that sounds like it's just what you want - WikiBooks. They are inthe process of building online field guides, which sounds like the format you are after SP-KP (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Here's an example of a page to give you an idea of the format [1] - it's about US birds though; it looks like British dragonflies are still at an early stage. SP-KP (talk) 08:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to reply, although I am confused about why you've posted on my user talk page, where hardly anyone else will ever see it, rather than on the talk page of the article in question, where it would have been entirely relevant to the topic I started. Regards, EatYerGreens (talk) 21:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!