User talk:Effrati856
This is Effrati856's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your draft article, User:Effrati856/sandbox/Effrati856 page
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, Effrati856. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/Effrati856 page".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 14:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Reliable Sources
[edit]Masdar has already been discussed by Wikipedia's editors and it was found to be reliable when it comes to territorial changes and unit compositions, despite it being pro-government, based on overlapping of what they report with what pro-opp SOHR reports (which is also considered reliable). Syrian Press Center has not been discussed regarding its reliability and is automatically considered biased due to its pro-rebel stance. It would be more appropriate to mention their claim in the main body of the article then in the infobox (with which I wouldn't have a problem with) EkoGraf (talk) 07:27, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Added it to the main body. EkoGraf (talk) 07:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
(Pinging @Serafart:, @Monopoly31121993(2):, and @Coffeeandcrumbs: as other editors involved)
Let's not have an edit war over which article should be the feature about this conflict in Afghanistan, please. Effrati856, you and Serafart both started articles about the subject. Battle of Ghazni (2018) is already being discussed at ITN. Could we reach a consensus of what material to merge into that article from Ghazni offensive? StrikerforceTalk 20:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes of course, sorry.
- What does ITN mean ?
- In the News. StrikerforceTalk 20:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- (Rushed reply) Busy off-wiki right now. But I support this idea to merge to Battle of Ghazni (2018) or vice versa if consensus changes about name. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- In the News. StrikerforceTalk 20:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Effrati856. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)