User talk:Elektro28

AfD nomination of Draft round values

I have nominated Draft round values, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft round values. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jenuk1985 | Talk 07:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft round values

A tag has been placed on Draft round values requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. roux 08:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

I appreciate your interest in improving this encyclopedia, as well as your energy in creating Draft Round Values three times. It has been deleted three times now, and I hope you can accept that the community does not feel, on the basis of notability and verifiability, that this article belongs in the encyclopedia. I hope that you will find some topic that is acceptable and create or improve other articles. You might check out the baseball WikiProject to see what they're up to. Ma^t_chups 03:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]