User talk:Ellismrtn321

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Tagged.com appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. DreamGuy (talk) 21:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE

I've noticed that a small group of users who obviously have bad will towards Tagged.com are seeking to suppress everything other than negative information and innuendo regarding the company. If you look at my edits, you will note that I have not removed negative references, simply placed them in their proper context. Historical revisionism (negationism) is not acceptable and is exactly why Wikipedia struggles to serve as a true reference source for unbiased information. I am taking it upon myself to make sure that a truthful, fair and balanced entry exists for Tagged.com, and I'm starting to keep an eye on some other entries that seem to be being victimized by a few, obviously biased users. This is not what Wikipedia is supposed to be about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellismrtn321 (talk • contribs) 16:45, June 11, 2009

Your idea of "proper context" is conspicuously at odds with our WP:NPOV policy. DreamGuy (talk) 23:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]