User talk:Emandems1/sandbox

What I liked:
• I think it was a good idea to start with the history since that hadn’t been added yet
• The introduction was a very good summary
• I liked how you presented your research with an impartial professional tone
• Your first reference by Dubey is perfect. It is a secondary source and seems to be an almost perfect summary of this topic

Future ideas:
• You could organize the already existing content into sections
• There is very little order in the existing page
• Add a picture or a figure
• I noticed that only the first citation Dubey’s paper was used. Maybe try to incorporate some of your other citations.
• The first sentence feels really long. You could break it into two sentences, for example:
• “The lattice protein model, first proposed by Dill et. al. in 1985, is a way to overcome the significant cost of predicting protein structure. The model uses only the hydrophobicity of the amino acids in the protein to predict the protein structure.”
• The second sentence identifies to classes: hydrophobic and polar. For consistency, I would use the classes hydrophobic and hydrophilic.
• If you find anymore citations as part of your research, I would also add them. I’m not sure but I think four references was meant to be treated as a minimum.
• Citations 2, 3, and 4 are primary research articles which is completely fine if they had something that can’t be found in a review article
• It would help your argument if you could find another review article

DK2975 (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The word "predict" is repeated in the sentence, "Their method was able to quickly predict predict an estimate of protein structure by representing proteins as "short chains on a 2D square lattice". It looks like you have a couple more sections you are working on so maybe you have already done this but try to get a few more references, especially review articles. So far it looks like you have been able to create a nice addition to the article. Good luck! 23francesco (talk) 04:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]