Jump to content

User talk:Emanuele Mastrangelo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Emanuele Mastrangelo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caffè Tommaseo

[edit]

1. I am not anti-Italian. I do not have a single nationalist bone in my body, for any country. Those who are anti-Italian - and please listen to this very very carefully - are those who lie, and deceive, and pretend, all in the cause of some crazy nationalistic imperialist dream. Bruno lied and lied and lied and lied again. He has been banned from itwiki for making legal threats and banned from enwiki for socking. Now, does this man, this liar, help your case? Tell me.
2. I welcome contributions to every article. But not from socks.
3. Your hysterical - Barba Nane especially - response to the sock case against DuilioM made fools of you. Fools. Fools fools. Your own checkusers confirmed it. Why are you so hysterical?
4. I know Emanuele Mastrangelo to be a man that I would disagree with about many things. I've read his articles. He and I are on opposite sides of the spectrum. But I welcome his presence, I know who he is, and I respect his ability to contribute and you can use his presence as a benchmark of my commitment to Wiki (as long as he uses inline citations in future - and if he doesn't use inline cites, I will delete his additions).
5. I played no part in Barba Nane getting blocked. But given his/her remarks about Bruno's latest socks, we are really better off without her. What a hothead. Idiot. Idiot. Idiot. Exactly the opposite of what an encyclopedia needs.
6. Your 'plan' is being closely watched, and monitored, and you can believe in the plainest of terms, that if childish rants on an unwatched talk page become a threat to the encyclopedia, then you will easily be kicked into the long grass.AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emanuele, in reply to your message at my talk, don't worry, the message above is not really intended for you, but for the other 'customers' of Caffè Tommaseo. I simply posted it here as I know they enjoy reading my contributions, and the crazy reactions I have been reading in the last couple of days were really too much. All this warrior talk of 'our plan' and so on needed a response, I felt (maybe I was wrong though) and so I put it here as of course you have also written on their page. User:Pigr8 seems very sensible. Apologies if my message above confused you, and I really am looking forward to seeing your contributions and to working together with you to help the encyclopedia. Best regards, AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

I removed a WP:NPA from your talk.

About related issues: if you want, we can talk about corrections to be made to articles: I'm not an expert in that field, but I hope I can help in some way. I believe the right place for this kind of discussion is here: my posts on it.wiki are just about some bad impressions I had, but if there's something uncorrect to fix in articles on this wiki, please make me understand where, with links and diffs. Thanks! --Yuma (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the problem highlighted is all about articles on the english language pedia, and everything we do and discuss is public, better talking about it here, and in english. Feel free to use my talk page in any case where you think there is a need of review, and I can try to clarify or pointing to the attention of more expert users. I don't promise nothing, but an attempt should be made, with good faith and a neutral approach. If you have a list of articles or single phrases or diffs or something, let me know. --Yuma (talk) 15:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]