User talk:EmmaLace

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, EmmaLace. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Terry Christian, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to add "award-winning" and "multi-award winning" to the lead, which is completely unsourced, it will continue to be removed. You have already been warned by Binksternet, so please stop wasting your time and ours. Rodericksilly (talk) 14:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced with relevant link. Not sure I'm the one wasting my time here. EmmaLace (talk) 16:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one wasting your time if you keep adding to pages unsourced content which is then removed. You've finally now decided to find a source but only because we have kept removing. Rodericksilly (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's sourced. A verifiable fact. So why have you removed it once again? EmmaLace (talk) 17:30, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't removed it. I've put it in the right place in the lead and improved the cite to give it a date and credit the author of the article. Rodericksilly (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! EmmaLace (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]