User talk:Erick v1998/sandbox

Article Evaluation

The structure of the article must be clear and understandable.

References must be scholarly and reliable and avoid using a source heavily.

There should be no bias in the article, meaning a neutral standpoint is required when talking about two different standpoints to ensure one isn't favored over the other.

Citations are a must to avoid copyright as well as having an adequate amount of references for the article.

References to a group of people must be specific and not broad and vague such as, "Most people agree", "many say".

When going through the article assigned to myself about the kola nut, most of the references that were cited were scholarly and reliable with the exception of a website here and there that wasn't as credible.

Sections in the talk page of the kola nut were giving interesting ideas with subtopics which included allergens and relating it to the Coca-Cola beverage. Erick v1998 (talk) 22:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Structure of notes was edited Erick v1998 (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]