User talk:Esoteriqa

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Boys_Blue

We are really sorry that you don't believe in facts which we, the official representatives of Mr. John McInerney are delivering. In such case Wikipedia will get aan official document from our lawyers and Mr. John McInerney himself and you will have two options - write the true history and keep true facts or delete article dedicated to Bad Boys Blue at all becaue at the moment when you're keeping it the way it is you're breaking the law and supporting imposters who never been real members of the group. And what's the most funny - you have even rewinded wrong birthdates and places of birth of former members and this also proves that you have no idea about Bad Boys Blue. Who do you think you are? You want Mr. John McInerney to call you himself? Allright, send your phone to bbb@badboysblue.eu and you'll be told the truth by him. It's inadmissible that people like you are allowed to edit articles concerning things you have no idea about. We're reporting it to Wikipedia crew as well as we've said it's the highest time to correct gossip stories and fake facts. Beyond dispute you constantly perver the real history and facts and how can you dare to call our edits a vandalismact? You wanna official documents, you'll get 'em from our lawyers, from Mr. John McInerney himself as well as from our labels - Coconut Music and Modern Romantics Productions. We have the right to deliver the truth, not pure lies like you're constantly doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BADBOYS BLUE (talk • contribs)

Legal threats

The above comment could be construed as a legal threat. This is expressly forbidden here, see WP:NLT. If you wish to conduct legal action you must stop editing immediately, you cannot both pursue legal action and edit Wikipedia at the same time. It also appears that you have a conflict of interest which can make writing a neutral article very difficult. I would suggest that if you wish to make changes to articles you have a connection with that you make suggestions on the articles talk page. I also suggest that you read WP:COI. I would be happy to help correct any issues you have with the article in question, but it is imperative that you withdraw any threats of legal action. --Leivick (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Boys Blue

To whom it may concern: the above mentioned poster who is throwing legal threats to the left and to the right is merely a webmaster from Poland who runs badboysblue.eu website (his name is available upon request). Apparently, the formation that he is paid to represent may have achieved some sort of a legal action which prevented the other contenders to stop their respective activities, presumably, under the laws of Russian Federation (sic) - something I reflected in my newest revision. My edits clearly stated that the article needed further revisions, and all I did was to remove some of the no longer appropriate name referrals/links - that's all, but I do have a problem when some paid characters decide to rewrite the history retroactively as they wish, while throwing vicious insults and threats as if Wikipedia is some kind of an ethnic bazaar. Esoteriqa (talk) 00:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My edits

If you have some good reason for reverting my edits, I wish you would discuss it on the article talk page. Rees11 (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to make further revisions, but please keep in mind that the version you are inclined on revising from is the one that was practically vandalized to on October 6. If you wish, please make reasonable revisions from the version that is consistent with the material that been compiled over the past years - namely, the one it is currently in the process of being revised. Besides, you are the one who reverted my edits, I merely restore it back... with some compromise, of course. Thank you. Esoteriqa (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have me confused with someone else. I have never reverted any of your edits. But I'm going to now. Rees11 (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I confused you with anybody. Up until your recent input, your edits were based on the mutilated form of the article in which it was in after the above mentioned date. Your contributions constituted reversions of my edits, as you did now. As I said, you are welcome to do your revisions based on the current form of the article, but your insistence of reverting my edits creates a sense of a potential edit war in which you chose to become engaged. Once again, you are welcome to contribute to the article, but please refrain from making such unappealing reverts to it. Esoteriqa (talk) 22:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Esoteriqa, you may want to familiarize yourself with the WP:OWN policy. You have no authority to decide whether or not another editor can edit an article, or how. Your insistence in restoring the article back to an older version in opposition to other editors may lead to a block if that behavior continues. -- Atama頭 03:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense, I do not insist on restoring the article back to the old version, only to the old template - there was nothing wrong with that notion. If everyone else on wiki had a similar way of misinterpreting things the way you did above, then wiki would be a useless place to be in. Hopefully, that is not the case on a larger scale. Esoteriqa (talk) 21:42, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bad Boys Blue - Heartbeat album cover 1986.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bad Boys Blue - Heartbeat album cover 1986.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC) Vanjagenije (talk) 10:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]