User talk:Evanalligatorwhite/sandbox
- Should I link to the official ACLU page? Also, how in depth should I go with describing what the Reproductive Freedom Project (ACLU) is? What is an appropriate amount of "chapters" or headings? Evanalligatorwhite (talk) 00:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Review:
Hello Evanalligatorwhite!
I think linking the official ACLU page would be beneficial since the article references the topic. The more in depth you can write about the Project the better. Subheadings can always be used if there seems to be too many headings. Overall, I think the organization of the article is strong and comprehensive! There could be more sources used since there aren't many cited or referred to. But, I understand that it can be difficult finding notable citations.
These are some questions that came into mind while reading the article (Perhaps this can gauge the direction of the article or add more context if there are available/reliable resources): Are there any key people or leaders who are spearing The Reproductive Freedom Program? Do there initiatives occur in a prominent location or where is there headquarters located? Does the institution collaborate with other initiatives and/or organizations? How is the project funded?
Also, here are some other sources that might be helpful:
https://rewire.news/article/2010/01/21/reflections-a-decade-reproductive-freedom/
http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1191&context=facpub
http://www.padnet.org/archRepro.html
http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1074&context=faculty_publications