User talk:Eveswing

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vigneswaran Rajkumar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 05:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wuhwuzdat[edit]

Why am i being tagged for Sockpuppetry? This must be a mistake. Eveswing (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the SPI investigation, linked above. WuhWuzDat 00:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen the link and I think this must be a mistake. Please review. Thanks.

I have reviewed my decision, and have not changed my mind. Lets let the Admins who work SPI investigate and decide, shall we? 00:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Thanks for reviewing. I think its a common ip leased by starhub isp in Singapore. Please investigate.

Blocked as a sock puppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 21:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I'm sorry, but your behavior and editing patterns are too similar to the other socks, not to mention CheckUser establishing a likely connection. –MuZemike 21:55, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eveswing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I like wikipedia and i like to editing articles that are in interest of singapore and within the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Singaporean Arts and Entertainment. Just to share my eveidance. i was editing titles in . I am not sure what editing patterns you are referring. Since my ip range is similar to the sockpuppet, i am being taged as one of the user. Please investigate and review my account. I will check with any admins or senior editor before contributing. Please review my account. Thank you. eveswing(talk) 15:09, 29 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid I agree with the SPI's conclusions. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eveswing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please review my block. I will contribute in accordance to wikipedia's policy and check with senior editors before contributing. Thanks. eveswing(talk) 14:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

i also agree with the validity of this block. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 16:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eveswing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please advice what should i do now? Thanks. eveswing(talk) 13:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your very first edits made here using this account, on December 21, betray a good working knowledge of wikipedia usage. I suggest you apply for unblock through your original account.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 14:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eveswing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't have a original account, why you guys don't understand. Ever since my 1st edits and contribution i did not betray wikipedia usage. Please review my block. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please note that further abuse of this template will result in removal of your talk page access. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eveswing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, I am trying to address and point out the reason for my unblock and in my previous messages. I did not damage wikipedia in anyway as you pointing out. I am making useful contribution with the scope of wikipedia. Why would i want to damage wikipedia as its a valuable tool to the community of the world. Please review my block.

Decline reason:

The evidence is pretty damning and you do not even address your block reason in this unblock request. Talkpage access revoked for abuse of the unblock template. Smashville^talk 15:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.