User talk:Fernando18/sandbox
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:Aaleksanian |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 4/26/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User:Fernando 18 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 04/26/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 04/26/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image appropriate. |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | N/A |
| Wikiformatting | External links was good, bullet points,nice formatting |
| Grammar & composition | None |
| Other comments | Nice Job |
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User: M.Caban |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 4/27/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User:Fernando 18 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 04/27/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 04/27/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image is appropriate. |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate to textbook |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | N/A |
| Wikiformatting | External links and bullet points are great. |
| Grammar & composition | Good |
| Other comments | Good job |
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:MsNika349 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 4/27/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User:Fernando 18 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 04/27/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 04/27/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image was appropriate. |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Information was Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate |
| Wikiformatting | Very good wiki formatting. Showed understanding of how to properly format. |
| Grammar & composition | Good altogether |
| Other comments | Good edit overall. |
| Name of student reviewer | Wikipedia User:CRamel16 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/2/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User:Fernando 18 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 05/2/13 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 05/2/13 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image appropriate. |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | Accurate |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | N/A |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | N/A |
| Wikiformatting | External links were used, bullet points,good formatting |
| Grammar & composition | None |
| Other comments | Good Work |
Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin
Date of review: 5/15/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: Fernando 18
URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short): short but simple length
Image (needed/appropriate): image was a good choice
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): N/A
Wikiformatting: the links were also a good idea, nice formatting
Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was good.
Other comments: great job overall!
User:A_Bhagwandin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)