User talk:Fiftyfires
Brisbane[edit]
Terrible in what sense. Structural? Organised? Everything unlike this...
. Ashton 29 (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- I appreciate your attempt to organise it to be neater, unfortunately your choice of images is what I find to be what's wrong with it. Having the cathedral take up a more prominent role in the montage with the city view stretched and crushed is not ideal. Also removal of an example of Queenslander architecture (although I'm sure you could find a better image) should 100% be included in any Brisbane montage considering how iconic they are to the city.--Fiftyfires (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Ashton, I just saw your edits to the montage and I'd like to thankyou for it, it's something I had tried to do in the past yet didn't have the skills for. I think the only possible improvement I could see in it is if the Merivale Bridge was removed (Is it that important to have in the montage anyway?) and replaced with an image of South Bank Parklands. Anyway thankyou again.--Fiftyfires (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- A while back, there was an image of the Wheel of Brisbane in the South Bank Parklands apart of an old montage, but people voted against its inclusion, so it was removed. Montages are something that must be discussed to death on an article talk page, and they usually cause a lot of derision and are just generally a very divisive topic, particularly with Australian cities. The problem is, so many users have an opinion, but very few an actual vision or drive to create their desired montage. They tend to just be vocal about their complaints, but action isn't forthcoming, unless it's reverting a change. Wikipedia also offers its own structural template for montages, but this involves finding suitable images that actually FIT within the template, and very few fit together. That's why it's best to create them on Photoshop, that way you have the freedom to chose your images, and also make them fit together nicely. Ashton 29 (talk) 08:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Ashton, I just saw your edits to the montage and I'd like to thankyou for it, it's something I had tried to do in the past yet didn't have the skills for. I think the only possible improvement I could see in it is if the Merivale Bridge was removed (Is it that important to have in the montage anyway?) and replaced with an image of South Bank Parklands. Anyway thankyou again.--Fiftyfires (talk) 11:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Fiftyfires. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Fiftyfires. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)