User talk:FirstComrade

Jardine and Hutton

With regard to your recent changes to Hutton and your comment re. Jardine. I have replaced the phrase "potential star" in the lead as this section should reflect the main body of the article and the main body of the article clearly mentions his potential stardom. As for Jardine, I have not got as far as expanding the section you are mentioning but as I do not have access to the book you mention, I'm not too clear what you are talking about: if you have the info and reference, it may be better if you add it. (By the way, you seem to have a fascination with the articles I edit as this in now four that you have either altered or commented on. Unless of course you are completely unconnected with Tillman or HughGal or BrownEdge or whoever. If so, my apologies.) On another topic, Wilf Barber/Wilfred Barber need merging together (which I plan to do fairly soon) but are horribly referenced. Are there any books which have info on him? I have none. --Sarastro1 (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Express deliveries does not have much on Barber except the odd sentence. The cricketer article may be the best bet: any idea how to get hold of it, or of someone who has it? Sorry to be ignorant, but who is JH? Initials aren't my strong point. Which player took issue with Hammond's personality faults, as a matter of interest? Foot is very good on gossip and innuendo which I'm sure is genuine but does not really give details. For example (this is for my own knowledge, not the article) how reliable is the STD stuff, how much of a womaniser was he and how widely known was it all? I'm not a huge fan of the Foot book. If you are as well informed as you seem to be, you may have a bit more info. (Barnett would make for a very good article. Probably a very good book.) Do you mean Hutton did not talk to Hammond or Barnett. Ditto comment on Hardstaff. Again, unless its referenced with page numbers etc, it's not for the article, just for my own interest.--Sarastro1 (talk) 23:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Your editing privileges have been suspended indefinitely

This account is a suspected sock puppet of Richard Daft and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to editing habits, contributions and/or any sockpuppetry investigations for evidence. This policy subsection may also be helpful. Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs – abuse log