User talk:Flowright138

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To communicate, please go to Edit and leave a message with a section and don't forget the 4 ~ to sign your post.

Welcome!

Hello, Flowright138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! I've replied to your question on my talk page. Vsmith (talk) 12:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did that because it is not correct. The armor clas has nothing to do with the tank class. You said:

Armor class 1: Light tank Armor class 2: Medium tank Armor class 3: Advanced medium tank Armor class 4: Heavy tank Armor class 5: Advanced heavy tank

But there are light tanks that are not armor class 1 but 2 (like the french H39) In armor class 2 are not only medium tanks but also advanced light tanks (like the Chaffeee) The german Panzer IV is only a medium tanks, but is categorized armor class 3 There are advanced medium tanks not armor class 3 but 4 (like the german Panther) And if one would link the armor class with the tank categories, you should mention the superheavy tanks in armor class 4 and 5.

There are a few exempels more, but I think these are sufficient. But there are more.

I really hope we together can make the Ruse wikipedia page wat it deserves to be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pieterdegreef (talkcontribs) 10:25, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Failed verification[edit]

The Template:Failed verification should work for the situation you describe. Vsmith (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC) I've fixed the tag at Thermoregulation. Vsmith (talk) 12:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In your recent addition to Glycosome, you need to add detail to your reference: Human Anatomy. Should include author(s), publication date, publisher, edition, and ISBN#. Vsmith (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gosick[edit]

Well, in my opinion, being able to survive against a bigger guy with a big weapon such as a halberd with brass knuckles and later, bare hands is impressive enough right? He only loses to the guy later because he dropped his knuckles somewhere. But oh well, if you really don't agree with me on the matter then it's okay. It was really just on a whim. I know realize that the setting of gosick isn't exactly consistent, especially on characters. I mean, look at the maid in Gray Wolf village, she's as fast as a werewolf or something. She's a just darn an average maid wearing dress, for god's sake >_>..By no means, she can be Robertta of Black Lagoon geez

Btw, I was already thrown off by how much an airhead Kujo can be despite being a successful transfer student that boasts about his knowledge sometimes... My name is 1340 (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamin7ove (talkcontribs)

Well, you are right about not writing on whim. However, what i wrote wasn't exactly untrue right? Kujo DID fight on par with someone bigger than him and with bigger weapon. Also, Kujo is not an airhead? The whole series, instead of making Victorique a genius, it makes all other characters some kind of inferior human race or something. They are all airheads...I swear some of the riddles there doesn't even need any thinking to solve(elementary level) problems...still, both Kujo AND the detective gave up... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamin7ove (talkcontribs) 11:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fastidious has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is unreferenced and chances are there that it is vandal. Notablity is also a question

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yasht101 09:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]