User talk:G0dsweed

from Notability on Organizations/companies

A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. Once notability is established, primary sources may be used to add content. Ultimately, and most importantly, all content must be attributable.G0dsweed 14:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

from What Wikipedia is not/when you wonder what to do.

When you wonder what should or should not be in an article, ask yourself what a reader would expect to find under the same heading in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precedents is not official policy, but can be referred to as a record of what has and hasn't been considered encyclopedic in the past.G0dsweed 14:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

from Wikipedia talk/articles for deletion Companies reported as significant subjects of news coverage are usually sufficiently notable.