User talk:GS120748
Welcome!
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 17:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of Dr Malcolm Kendrick from Wikipedia
[edit]I am disgusted by the removal of the page relating to Dr Malcolm Kendrick. Dr Kendrick is an opponent to the current orthodoxy as to the cause of heart disease and is a medical doctor. His thesis is perfectly reasonable and he robustly argues it. His view is increasing supported generally and is also supported by various scholarly articles that he frequently cites to evidence his thesis. The essence of science is for orthodoxies to be challenged. I have noticed a tendency recently to suppress dissenting voices in science and am appalled that Wikipedia is complicit in this practise and has removed Dr Kendrick on the basis of one mans submission when there were several supportive posts. GS120748 (talk) 16:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)