User talk:Gaurav4291/GS1
Appearance
India Since Independence-Bipin
[edit]C6-Initial years of Independence
[edit]Pg.75,76 | 1. Independence had accompanied by a multitude of problems: 1. Centuries of backwardness, prejudice, inequality still weighed on the land 2. Two centuries of colonialism 3. Had to fulfill promises of freedom struggle 4. Immediate problems:
|
Pg.77 | 1. India embarked on its journey with some outstanding leadership 1. Nehru, Sardar Patel, C. Rajagopalachari, Rajendra prasad, Maulana Abul kalam azad, Govind Ballabh Pant 2. Congress enjoyed nationwide popularity among masses. Its position was unchallenged. 3. Many felt the need of a strong opposition that will bring wide variety of thoughts into the decision making |
Pg.78-83 | 1. Accession of princely states 1. Post-indpendence, unification of India was one of the most important task at hand. 2. Princely states enjoyed protection by the British govt. Once they left future of princely states became a matter of concern 3. Many princely states desired to become independent and become nation. 4. Even British govt. hinted to them that they could remain independent if they desire to do so. But at the time of Independence, British govt. changed its stand and asked all the princely states to be in one of the dominions(India or Pakistan) 5. Sardar Patel with his diplomacy succeeded in pursuing the princely states to integrate with India in a number of stages. 6. In general, common people of these princely states have participated in the freedom struggle and had feelings of Indian nationalism. Thus it was becoming difficult for the princess to hold on to their states. 7. Fearful of the people`s movement and pressure from the govt. most of the princely states acceded to India by 15th Aug 1947. But 3 states - Jammu and Kashmir, Junagadh and Hyderabad acceded by 1948 only. 8. During this time, govt. was of the opinion that the people should themselves decide there fate, so the then govt. didn`t wanted to force these princes. Indian govt. was open to the option of holding plebiscite in these areas. 9. Junagadh prince wanted to join Pakistan but the masses wanted to remain in India. Pakistan accepted the accession of Junagadh, but the prince was forced out by the people and a plebiscite was conducted which went in favour of India. 10. J&K
|
Pg.83-85 | 1. The communal holocaust 1. Partition led to nearly 6 million refugees 1. India was in the midst of a communal holocaust
|
Pg.85 | 1. Rehabilitation of refugees 1. Rehabilitation of 6 million refugees was a daunting task. 1. Rehabilitation on west front was done by 1951, since almost all the refugees moved to this side in one go. 1. But the rehabilitation on the east front was stretched till 1971. During Independence, a large population of Hindus stayed on the other side. 1. As the atrocities and communal forces broke on the other side, a steady stream of refugees kept coming till 1971. 1. Govt. had the task of providing them with food, shelter, job and psychological assurance. 1. On the west front, refugees could be settled in the lands vacated by the muslims on this side and it was easier to settle them in himachal, delhi, rajasthan areas due to similarity in language 1. But on the east front, Bengali`s could only be settled in Bengal, parts of Assam or Tripura. Many peasants had to be settled in sub-urban areas. |
Pg.86 | 1. Relations with Pakistan 1. Despite the Kashmir issue, Indian govt. followed the policy of fair dealing and promoting conciliation and reducing mutual tension. 2. In 1948, following a fast by Gandhiji, India paid Pakistan Rs 550 million as part of the assets of partition, even while it feared that the money would be used to finance military action in Kashmir. 3. Along with the Kashmir issue, the atrocities in the east Bengal was carried on. Migration from both sides was happening. 4. Many urged to intervene in east Bengal militarily to protect the minorities. 4. Regarding it as human problem, the govt. tried to solve it through persuasion 4. In 1950, Nehru-Liaqat pact was signed to resolve the issue of protection of minorities. 4. Other issue of distribution of canal water in Punjab. India agreed to supply an undiminished water supply. 8. In general, the Indian govt. followed policy to improve relations. |
CH-7
[edit]Pg.89,90 | 1. Making of India as a nation is a product of a historical process and has been therefore in the making for a very long. 2. The roots of India`s nationhood lies in its history and also in its experience of freedom struggle. 3. Rabindranath Tagore put, the unity of India is the `unity of spirit`. 4. Elements of administrative, political and economic unity has developed especially under Mughals. 5. National movement played a pivotal role in welding Indians together politically and emotionally into a nation. 6. The depth and duration of this struggle penetrated the feeling of nationhood into the masses. 7. Political leaders realized that the making of a nation is a prolonged and continuous process. And one which was open to continuous challenges, interruption and even reversal. As seen in 1947, with the creation of Pakistan. 8. Indian leaders were aware that keeping India united will be a challenge even after the Independence. 9. India`s complex diversity - Myriad number of languages, religions, tribals 10. The emergence of a strong national identity and development of regional cultural identities were seen as simultaneous process. 11. Consequently, the consolidation of India was to occur around the concept of `Unity in diversity`. 12. It was recognised that this diversity of India could also be a source of weakness. Diversity could be used for divisive purposes such as communalism, casteism, and regional and linguistic differences. 13. The issues of job, educational opportunities, access to politcal power, share in the economic development could and did fuel conflicts based on religion, region, caste and language. 14. Special efforts were necessary. Unique solutions were to be divised not seen anywhere in the world. 15. Policies were to be framed to reduce glaring inequalities, to promote equal opportunity to all, to promote social justice. 16. Initially it was argued that an authoritarian political structure was needed to hold such a diverse nation. But it could have backfired, different regions could have pulled in different directions, hatred could have risen. It was for this reason, such a diverse nation needed democracy. Only democracy could have given equal opportunity and voice to different socio-economica, cultural and political sections. |
Pg.91, | 1. The constitutional structure established in 1950 encompassed the demands of diversity as well as the requirement of unity. 2. It provided for a federal structure with a strong centre but also a great deal of autonomy for the states. 3. The makers kept in view the difference between the disintegration and decentralization and between unity and centralization. 4. The parliament was to act as institution where the basic and the ultimate power resided. It was the institution uniting the nation. Every voice was given equal opportunity. 5. Also political parties acted as a great integration force. All the major political parties were all-india in character. They stood for the unity of the nation. 1. Differences between the political parties were only on ideological levels not based on religion or language. 2. A major asset of the congress leadership was that it was well versed in accommodative politics. It had been able to keep united diverse political and ideological trends during the anti-imperialist struggle. 3. After Independence also, Congress was willing to accommodate and listen to the voice of opposition, dissenters. It was sensitive to cultural and linguistic issues. 6. The Indian army and the IAS was also a force for forging national unity. 1. Recruitment was done on merit basis irrespective of caste or religion. 2. The services were all India in character 7. Indian economy: 1. Industrial development was promoted on a national scale. Dams, power plant, steel mills, factories etc. 2. Economic development was seen as an important element for national consolidation. |
Pg.94 | 1. The Language problem: 1. The language problem was the most divisive problem issue in the starting years of Independent India. 2. People love their language and it is an integral part of culture. 3. There were two major issues:
|
CH-8
[edit]Pg.102 | 1. In pre-1947 India, boundaries of provinces were haphazard, no heed was paid to linguistic or cultural cohesion. Thus most of the provinces were multi-lingual and multi-cultural. And interspersed princely states had added a further element to the heterogeneity. 2. The case for linguistic states as administrative units was very strong. 1. Language is related to culture and thus to the customs of people 2. For spread of education and growth of mass literacy, it can occur only in mother tongue 3. Democracy can become real to common people only when politics and administration is done in mother tongue. 4. And administrative, political and judicial language can only be in mother tongue when the states are organized based on language. 5. It is for this reason, congress amended its constitution in 1921 and reorganised its regional branches on a linguistic basis. Since, then congress has committed itself to redrawing of provincial boundaries based on linguistic lines. 3. But immediately after Independence, which saw creation of Pakistan. It was considered the prime important thing is to work for the unity of nation and to keep it united. Dividing it on linguistic lines may fuel rivalries and may pull the nation in different directions. This was the time to be focused on economic development of the nation while keeping the nation united. The govt. was still committed to the idea of states based on linguistic lines but this was given low priority at this time. |
Pg. 103 | 1. In 1948, Linguistic provinces committee (Dar Commission) was formed. Which advised against the linguistic provinces at the time for it might threaten national unity. Thus constituent assembly decided not to incorporate the linguistic principle in the constitution. But people were not satisfied especially in the south. 2. Thus JVP (J.L. Nehru, Vallabhbhai Patel, Pattabhi Sittaramayya) committee was formed in Dec`1948. This committee advised against the creation of linguistic states for time being citing national unity, national security and economic development as the need of the hour. 3. JVP report was not against the formation of states based on linguistic lines. This report followed popular movements for states all over the country. The demand for a separate Telugu state-Andhra was very strong and had support of people and political parties. 4. JVP committee accepted that a strong case of Andhra formation out of Madras presidency existed, but the two sides could not agree on which state should take the Madras city. Andhra leaders were unwilling to concede Madras even though on linguistic as well as geographic grounds it belonged to Tamilnadu. 5. In 1953, a freedom fighter, Patti Sriramalu undertook a fast unto death over the demand for a separate Andhra state. After his death, there were violent protest all over the state, riots, ultimately govt. gave into the demand and Andhra state was formed in 1953. And Tamilnadu for tamil speaking population. 6. The success of Andhra struggle encouraged other linguistic groups to agitate for their own state. 7. In 1953, SRC (State reorganisation committee) was formed to look into the subject of reorganisation of the states of the union. SRC committee recommended linguistic principle for redrawing of boundaries but administrative and economic factors should be given due consideration. SRC was against the splitting of Punjab and Bombay. There were strong reaction to the report in many parts of the country. 8. States reorganisation act was passed in 1956, it provided for 14 stats and 6 centrally administered territories. 1. Telangana area of Hyderabad was transferred to Andhra, 2. Kerala was created by merging Malabar district of old Madras presidency with Travancore-Cochin. 3. Certain areas of Kannada speaking areas of Bombay, Madras, Hyderabad and Coorg were added to the Mysore State. 4. Bombay state was enlarged 9. Strongest reaction to SRC report came from Maharastra. Ultimately, In June,1956 Bombay was divided into Maharastra and Gujarat with Bombay city being centrally administered state. This was not acceptable to Maharastra side, there were strong protest. In July,1956 the decision was reverted. Both Mahrastra and Gujarat side was not happy both wanted separate states with bombay as there capital. 10. Despite the disagreement over Bombay city, States reorganisation act was passed in Dec,1956. But there were popular agitation everywhere in Bombay. Finally, In 1960, Bombay was split into Mahrastra with Bombay city as its capital and Gujarat with Ahmedabad as its capital. |
Pg.105 | 1. Punjab: 1. In1956, The states of PEPSU had been merged with Punjab. It made it a trilingual state - Hindi, Punjabi and pahari. The Punjabi speaking population wanted a Punjabi suba (Punjabi speaking state). Unfortunately the issue assumed communal overtones. 2. Congress and SRC was against the redrawing of boundaries based on communal lines. 3. But ultimately, Punjab was divided - Punjabi speaking Punjab and Hindi speaking Haryana and Kangra was added to Himachal. While Chandigarh was made a UT and was to serve joint capital of Haryana and Punjab. 2. Events in 1956, showed the loyalty to a language was consistent with and was complimentary to loyalty to the nation. It has created coherent states willing to support the centre. It has kept the federal structure intact. 3. States reorganisation is `best regarded as clearing the ground for national integration`. 4. States reorganistation based on linguistic lines have strengthen the unity of the nation. 5. Language rather than being a force for division has proved a cementing and integrating influence. 6. Still reorganisation did not resolve all the problems related to linguistic conflicts. 1. Disputes over boundaries between states 2. Linguistic minorities 3. Economic issues - such as sharing of river waters, power, 4. Linguistic chauvinism |
Pg.106 | 1. Minority Language: 1. Unilingual states were not possible in whatever manner their boundaries were drawn, which resulted in a large number of linguistic minorities. 2. Challenges:
|
CH-9
[edit]Pg.109 | 1. The task of integrating the tribal people into the mainstream was extremely complex due to:
|
Pg.110 | 1. Root`s of India`s Tribal policy
|
Pg.113 | Tribals in the northeast: 1. The tribes in northeast shares many features and problems of the tribal people of the rest of the country. But their situation (during Independence) was different in several aspects
|
Pg.117 | Mizoram 1. A similar situation to Nagaland was risen in Mizoram. 2. Tribes demanded secession backed by some British officials but lacked support from the Mizo youth. Youth instead focused on the economic development of the Mizo society, wanted adequate representation of Mizo in the Assam legislative. 3. However, unhappiness with the Assam govt. rose during the relief measures during 1959 famines and Assam govt. act of Assamese as official language. 4. Some extremist leaders with support from east Pakistan - declared independence and revolted, Indian govt. moved in the Indian army and the rebellion was controlled with leaders hiding in the east Pakistan. 5. In 1973, Mizo leaders scaled down their demands to a separate state within the Union of India. |
Pg.118 | Jharkhand 1. It comprises of the tribal areas of the Bihar (Chota Nagpur, Santhal Parganas) 2. Major tribes - Santhal, Ho, Oraon, Munda 3. Unlike traditional tribes, they all practice settled plough agriculture on the basis of family famrs 4. Significant number of tribals work as agricultural labourers, mining and industrial workers. 5. Landholding pattern is unequal 6. A class society has developed among them. 7. Most of the tribals practice Hinduism or Christianism. 8. Many rebellions have been organised in past and they have also participated in the nationalist freedom struggle. 9. With spread of education, demand of separate state was raised. 10. But the state reorganisation commission rejected the demand on the grounds that the region didn`t have a common language. 11. Central govt. also claimed that the tribals being a minority cannot claim a state of their own. 12. The tribal political parties saw that demanding a tribal state cannot work. So they changed the strategy. They showed the economic difference between the north Bihar and the tribal region. Both tribal and non-tribal population was suffering from economic disparity. Thus they garnered the support from the non-tribals also. Tribal leaders also understood that this might not give them a tribal state but they would still get higher representation in the new state as compared to the current scenario. 13. Jharkhand came into existence in 2000. 14. Chhattisgarh and Uttaranchal in 2002. |
CH-10
[edit]Pg.120 | 1. Regionalism:
|
Pg.121 | 1. Regionalism could have flourished in India if any state or regions had felt that it was being dominated culturally or it being discriminated. 2. But, India has been successful in not just accommodating diversity in unity but has been able to celebrate this diversity. 3. Different regions and areas have been provided and enabled with full cultural autonomy which has played important role in fulfilling their aspirations. 4. The linguistic reorganisation of the state and resolution of the official language issue have played a very important role in this respect, by eliminating potential a potent cause of feeling of cultural loss or cultural domination and therefore regional conflict. 5. Many regional disputes have the potential of becoming interstate hostility.
|
Pg.126 | Sons of the soil 1. An acute kind of regionalism where people with a particular mother tongue brand themselves as the sons of the soil and claim the land belongs to a group of people who speak a particular language. Those who do not speak that language are branded as outsiders. 2. Unequal economic development in different parts of the country especially cities, made people demand preference to local people in the employment or educational opportunities. 3. In the struggle for the appropriation of economic resources and economic opportunities recourse was often taken to communalism, casteism and nepotism. Language loyalty and regionalism was often used to exclude outsiders from the economic life of the state or city. 4. Important questions to be asked:
|
C11 - The years of hope and achievement:1951-64
[edit]Pg.131 | 1. These years were the years when India was more or less stable, country began to progress in all directions. 2. People experienced an advance towards the basic objectives of : Democracy, Civil liberties, Secularism, a scientific outlook, economic development and planning with socialism at the end of the road. 3. There was some discontent among the intelligentsia regarding the slow pace of development, problems of poverty, unemployment, slow land reforms, etc. 4. Among the several areas of progress and achievement, though marked by certain weaknesses and limitations, were:
|
Pg.132 | 1. The Rooting of the electoral process
|
Pg.136 | 1. Establishment of Democratic Institutions
|
Pg.138 | 1. The administrative structure
|
Pg.140 | 1. Development of science and technology
|
Pg.141 | 1. Social Change
|
Pg.143 | 1. Education
|
Pg.144 | 1. Community development programme
|
CH-12
[edit]CH-13
[edit]CH-14
[edit]CH-15
[edit]CH-16
[edit]CH-17
[edit]WorldHistory-CL10
[edit]C9-Imperialism and Colonialism
[edit]Pg-7 | Imperialism: 1. It is the practice of exercise of control economy and polity by a country over other regions or countries outside its own boundaries. This may be done by military means or by any other means. 2. The essential feature of imperialism is the exploitation of the subordinate country with or without direct political control. Colonialism: 1. The practice of acquiring territories by military or other means and making them dependent. Neo-colonialism: 1. The exploitation particularly economic exploitation of an independent but less developed country Phases of colonialism/imperialism 1. The first phase of imperialism started in the 16th century. From 16th to 18th century, major areas of Asia, Africa and Americas were colonialized. 2. Slave trade - Europeans occupied many coastal areas in the Africa and made the habitants slave and also transported them as slave to Americas. 3. Europeans mainly came to Asia for trade and tried to establish monopoly by restricting others from entering that market by way of war or political control over the region. |
Pg-8 | Conditions that helped the growth of Imperialism in the 19th century 1. Demands created by the industrial revolution: a.) Industrial revolution resulted in great increase in the production of goods. And simultaneously it resulted in capitalist system of production. In capitalist system, the main aim of the industries is to maximise profit. Profit is maximised by producing as much as possible and keeping the wages low. b.) The production was very high and the local economy couldn`t absorb all the production goods. And the wages were low, so their capacity to absorb the excess production was limited. And the possibility to find market for their products in other industrial nations was also less, as all the industrial nations were protecting their own manufacturers. Thus new markets had to be found. c.) These industrial nations could sell their produce in the markets like Africa and Asia which were behind in industrial development. These industrial nations began increasing political domination in these areas and also protected their own interests by eliminating other industrial nations and also by killing the local industries. d.) In addition to new markets, these industrialists nations needed raw material. And Asia and Africa were a great source of raw materials like cotton, rubber and metals like gold, silver, Iron, coal and other raw materials. And they also found very cheap labour in these regions. e.) By the end of 19th century, the western countries started to see Asia and Africa as the preferred destination for capital investment. As capital investment was not giving much returns in the European continent thus financial institutions started to giving credits to industries to invest in the Asia and Africa but not for the development of these colonies but for the development of industries which would export raw materials to the parent nation. d.) Thus, political control was also required to safeguard their interest in the colonies. As local governments would not have been able to protect industrialists from uprisings or any change in govt. could harm their industries also. Ex- Morocco in North Africa became French Morocco after the appeal from French investors to annex it. 2. Improvement in transportation and communication: a.) Steamships made transportation of raw materials and finished goods between the mother country and the colonies much faster than the old sailing vessels. b.) cheap labour helped in laying rail roads in colonies, inland waterways were made. And these helped in reaching the inner lands of the colonies. Raw materials good easily be transported from the inner lands to the ports and then to the mother nations. 3. Extreme nationalism : Pride and Power a.) In the latter part of 19th century, many European nations started seeing itself as superior than the other nations. The number of acquired represented their status in the world. Nations started to acquire more territories just to safeguard their other colonies from other imperialists nations. Regions like Port Said, Aden, Singapore, Hongkong etc. were acquired not to protect England but to protect their interests in their colonies, especially India. b.) Manpower from these colonies were used in the army mostly forced into wars to acquire new colonies. Also employed in for work in mining, plantations. 4. The "Civilising mission" - Men and Ideas : a.) The Europeans considered themselves to be of superior race and thought of imperialism as a noble cause to civilize the inferior races. Christian missionaries propagated Christianism and also imperialism to educate and civilize the local population. b.) The explores and adventurers also played role in spreading imperialism. They went into unknown or little known territories and brought back reports of areas where their trade could benefit. And after that their home country would acquire that region. 5. Conditions that favoured imperialism in Asia and Africa: a.) The most important factor was that industrial revolution hasn`t reached these places. The local handicrafts men were using old hand tools which resulted in low production. There goods were admired by westerners. Lack of industrial revolution also meant that these regions couldn`t match the westerners militarily. b.) Though once, these regions had very powerful empires but by the 19th century there methods of administration had outlived their purpose. Most of these regions lacked the sense of nationhood, their loyalties were mostly to the local princes and chiefs. They often neglected the welfare of their subjects. Thus this explains why only a bunch of westerners were able to acquire such vast territories. And with the help of their govt.`s they were able to acquire countries. |
Pg-11 | Conquest in Asia 1. British in India: a.) The East India company came in 1600. And with the decline of the Mughal empire - it gave the British to increase the control over the India. And with the revolt of 1857, British govt. got full control of India. b.) India came to be known as the brightest jewel in the crown of British empire. With Industrial revolution, British goods were poured into the India which ruined the local handicrafts industry. c.) British brought social and economic changes in the society. Local people were used as cheap labour to expand railways and were not given important positions in the governance. Tea, coffee, Indigo plantations were promoted and exported to Britain. 2. Imperialism in China: a.) Imperialism in China started with what is known as the Opium wars. China gave very limited access to foreign traders, they gave only two ports to foreign traders. British govt. bought Chinese tea, silk from China but couldn`t sell their products into China. b.) British merchant started illegal opium trade in China. China destroyed on of the cargo to which British declared war which China lost. China had to open 5 ports to British and couldn`t demand duties on imports. Hongkong was handed over to Britain. c.) France also fought with China and got similar privileges. d.) Japan also started to exercise control over korea of which China had overlordship. China and Japan went into war which Japan won. China gave Korea her independence and ceded Formosa and other islands to China. And also payed Japan for war damages. e.) France, China, Germany and Britain gave China loan to pay for the damages and in return got certain regions in China where they could trade freely, start mining operations, made railway lines, acquired ports. f.) With growing influence of European powers in various regions of China, USA feared that it would hamper their trade with China. Thus, USA suggested for a "Open Door" policy which can be described as "Me too" policy. In this, everyone will be allowed free access to trade in China with equal rights. Britain also supported this idea since it will discourage any annexation ideas of Russia and Japan which could very easily send in their armies. g.) The scramble for privileges in China stopped after the Boxer rebellion by local people which was suppressed by the European powers. For which China had to pay damages and was reduced to an international colony. h.) The division of China into spheres of influence is described as the cutting of the Chinese melon. |