User talk:Gdchinacat
August 2020
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Thom Brennaman. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please stop activating the edit request template until a consensus is reached for your request - FlightTime (open channel) 20:59, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
For the record, the edit request was initially rejected for not being verifiable. I updated the request to indicate that an existing source for the content being changed was the source for my edit. FlightTime then rejected it for not having sources, so I moved the source to the top of the request. Then he posted this. I believe he is being disruptive and discouraging editing by incorrectly rejecting the edit request and incorrectly claiming my edits were disruptive.
Thom Brennaman
[edit]Please stop activating the edit request template. You need to gain consensus before any changes will be made, the edit request template should not be active during this time. You repeatedly re-activating the template is wasting other editors time and is considered disruptive and could lead to a block from editing at all. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)