User talk:GenoV84/2019/October

"Vandalism: page restored"

Please take a look at the discussion I linked in my edit summary, as well as the article's edit history - the material restored on July 16 really is a redundant fork made by a sock, there really was a consensus to remove it, and it really does fundamentally have the same issues today. Absolutely nothing against the improvements you and others have made in the meantime, you've been doing fine work, but the material you're working on is still almost entirely a copy-paste of Yahweh, and that should be addressed. Smowo (talk) 08:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

@Smowo: Thanks. I read the discussion that dates back to 2018, and no one agreed to delete it. Rather, it was suggested to either merge it or keep it. Anyway, the article in its current state can stand on its own and doesn't look like a duplicate of Yahweh anymore, since the unsourced claims have already been deleted and now it's full of reliable references and informations, although many improvements are still to be made. Also, I'm planning to expand it and add more material to it.--GenoV84 (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)