User talk:GenoV84/2022/December

2022 Fifa World Cup

Why did you revert my edits? The edit I made to security is clearly biased leaving out that part where they said they will find the camera using there high-tech cameras. What is included in the article makes it seem the Qatari police was going to do nothing about it, and the reality is she was just surprised that they asked what punishment she wanted for the thief. So why was that reverted? As for my changes to the lead its true as even said that it shows a cultural clash between Arab/Islamic values, and Western Norms/Secular Liberal Values, so I did not make this up its in an article cited https://www.latimes.com/sports/soccer/story/2022-11-20/qatar-world-cup-politics-arab-world-gulf-states. I also corrected a grammatical error and that was reverted. Jibreel23 (talk) 17:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

I suppose that you didn't check the various other reliable sources cited in the article, which state exactly what was written in the lead section before your unexplained edits. Also, changing "woman" to "female" as you did on the article is completely unnecessary, and that sentence about the confusion of the people interviewed by the journalist is nonsensical and unnecessary as well. GenoV84 (talk) 17:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)'

Why was changing woman to female completely unnecessary? The word fits better. Also why is including the police were trying to help the journalist nonsensical? What is currently in the article misrepresents the situation even from how the citation presents it. Although for what I edited in the lead, the way it is now complies more with the citations that are currently being used, so you were right. Jibreel23 (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for understanding that. I just restored the details that you added to the Security section. GenoV84 (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for thanking me

Wanted to say that, also I appreciate your work on the site MatsLP (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop the personal attacks

Hi GenoV84. I am sorry to see us in a dispute at Talk:Armenian genocide, especially since all you've done is bring—in obvious good faith—a great source to the table. Can we please discuss the source without personally attacking other editors. You were warned once about this by PC, and have since attacked PC. Please stop, so that we can focus on content and ensure there's consensus for changes to this quality article. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry Firefangledfeathers, but I have absolutely no intention to talk with people that explicitly or implicitly deny and/or relish on the genocide of Armenians, as that user did on the talk page of the article several times through his nonsensical and offensive replies. No thanks, I'm out of it. GenoV84 (talk) 18:51, 24 December 2022 (UTC)