User talk:GeorgePierBain

Welcome![edit]

Hello, GeorgePierBain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Far-left politics. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 20:56, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Far-right politics with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Far-right politics. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TFD (talk) 21:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are also edit-warring on Far-left politics and similarly stop. TFD (talk) 21:15, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conservapedia[edit]

Hey there. I've undone your recent edit to this article because your edit seemed to portray the abortion-breast cancer link as a valid scientific hypothesis rather than widely discredited fringe view in the medical community. (see [1]) If I have misinterpreted the intent your edit or you believe your version is more correct for some other reason, please let me know. Thanks, Intelligentsium 03:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You marked your edit as a minor edit. Minor edits are supposed to be uncontroversial spelling or formatting changes - a significant change in the tone or content of a statement usually should not be marked as minor. When in doubt, don't mark minor is the general rule! Cheers, Intelligentsium 03:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]