User talk:Gijs Kruitbosch

Genealogy

Kruitbosch's came from Holland (Netherlands)in the middle 1860's as part of the The Church of JESUS CHRIST of Latter-Day Saints migration-- and settled in Ogden, Weber County, Utah. Kruitbosch was (is) Translated "FLOWERBUSH".Members of the Kruitbosch Family still reside in the Ogden, Utah area--and through-out the western part of the United States as well as in The Mother Country, "Holland".

                            I am Gary Taylor Kruitbosch     1954-
                                 Delorm John Kruitbosch     1924-2003
                                 John Hyrum  Kruitbosch     1895-1972
                                             Kruitbosch     18__-18__
                                             Kruitbosch     17__-18__

--67.158.31.66 16:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Gary Taylor Kruitbosch[reply]

OK... But what does this have to do with me? Gijs Kruitbosch 14:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chatzilla

Does Chatzillöa really support the irc:// protocol? look at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=irc%3A and explain me why these bugs are open since 5years! o.O

mabdul 12:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh... Did you actually read the bug summaries? Not all of them are 5 years old anyway. They are mostly integration bugs (in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey, not in ChatZilla). Then there is one bug which relates to whether we check if servers are part of a network that the user is already connected to (which has nothing to do with protocol support). There is one bug about irc:// links in META refresh tags etc. on webpages automatically opening ChatZilla and connecting (privacy concerns over that). And there is one on automatically registering ChatZilla to open irc:// links using the Windows registry. None of those take anything away from the fact that ChatZilla parses, uses, and in fact, was one of the first to specify ( http://www.mozilla.org/projects/rt-messaging/chatzilla/irc-urls.html ) an irc:// protocol. Note that the actual specifics of the URI scheme differ wildly among different IRC clients, but that's hardly something ChatZilla should be held accountable for... Hope that helps. Gijs Kruitbosch (talk) 12:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

g* no, not really. I read only bug summaries of interesting topics or I search something important.

"And there is one on automatically registering ChatZilla to open irc:// links using the Windows registry." --> huch? that bug i read full - isn't that we are talking about: clicking oin ie a irc link, automatic opens chatzilla and conntecting? or did I missunderstand something? mabdul 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That depends. The table heading doesn't make explicit what is meant. ChatZilla supports handling the links when they are passed to it. Given that it is in 99% of cases installed as a browser add-on, and will automatically handle links there (exactly as you described), it seems fair enough to label the column "Yes". If people modify the registry themselves, and point to Firefox (or whatever browser they installed ChatZilla in) this will also work. It's just that ChatZilla doesn't register itself as the default handler of the protocol, which doesn't usually matter since 99% of the links to IRC are from webpages, and in that case it will work fine... Gijs Kruitbosch (talk) 15:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. now it is clearer for me. never thought of using chatzilla as a standalone application. ok. you're right: this should be a yes. in any time this will be fixed hopefully. mabdul 17:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]