User talk:GirthOfPerth

September 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 12:09, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia’s commitment to neutrality and accuracy is fundamental to its mission. When editing, it’s crucial to adhere to these principles. While it’s natural to have strong opinions, contributing to Wikipedia involves presenting information in a balanced and factual manner. If you encounter bias, engage in constructive discussions on the article’s talk page to ensure that Wikipedia remains a reliable source of information for all users. Vandalism or biased editing undermines the credibility of the platform and hinders its ability to serve as a trustworthy resource. It’s our collective responsibility to uphold Wikipedia’s standards and provide an accurate representation of topics. GirthOfPerth (talk) 12:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lidia Thorpe, you may be blocked from editing. DanielRigal (talk) 18:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at User talk:GirthOfPerth. There is nothing about "threats" in that article and so I have removed your comment here as defamatory. DanielRigal (talk) 22:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not unsourced or poorly sourced information it is factual information! Why are you ignoring that fact and not giving me a proper explanation?

The sad thing is, some people wish to hide truths!! GirthOfPerth (talk) 00:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly It's utterly ridiculous yet unsurprising that you could threading to block my editing ability based upon fact to which you know nothing about.

You are basing your one argument on emotion. I think you need to look within. GirthOfPerth (talk) 13:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relax. I'm not hounding you. Just don't add any more unreferenced (or improperly referenced) defamatory content and you will be fine. DanielRigal (talk) 16:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So despite my points I raised with the previous systems administrator, after my updates were removed, you have decided to block me based purely on comments which are not public.

What a joke. GirthOfPerth (talk) 03:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I actually challenge you to give me logic reason as to why I'm blocked. GirthOfPerth (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]