User talk:GlenProwse

April 2024

Hello, I'm Binksternet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Terrence Howard seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I naturally expected this page to state the aforementioned in the introduction upon looking up his Wikipedia page after watching his public discourse, especially with the Oxford Union. He has infamy for his 1x1=2 theory yes, however, this is not the reason you should edit because of bias toward it or other reasons. Impartially, his page has a section on his public intellectualism and aligns with Wikipedia's page on Intellect. Moreover, you should've gathered how my only bias is entered in the editing reasons. His page's introduction isn't a true reflection, please rectify. GlenProwse (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual GlenProwse (talk) 06:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 00:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's enough, especially with the "Binky" business. Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for contravening Wikipedia's policy against harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 00:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep this up you'll be indefinitely blocked or have access to this talkpage removed. We don't tolerate harassment, based on edit count or anything else. Acroterion (talk) 03:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're misunderstood sorry. I was using the opportunity to let you, an administrator, know about this user's overzealousness going against the very principles you stand for and his reasons why. Many of this user's reverted revisions are reverted. I didn't know Wikipedia is becoming the wild west until looking into this user, so could you. Good day. GlenProwse (talk) 03:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very familiar with this editor, and I'm not mistaken. He gets crap all the time for upholding the encyclopedia's standards. Please don't add to that. You responded to a minor disagreement with sustained abuse, despite my warnings. Acroterion (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]