User talk:Globalsupplychains

June 2022

Hello Globalsupplychains. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Globalsupplychains. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Globalsupplychains|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 02:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I certify that I am NOT being directly or indirectly compensated for any of my edits. Globalsupplychains (talk) 02:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hi Globalsupplychains! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Hau Lee that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for clarifying! Very helpful. I'll be more cautious about labeling minor edits in the future. Globalsupplychains (talk) 20:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Hau Lee moved to draftspace

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hau L. Lee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hau L. Lee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 02:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because

- The page has excellent citations. I am unable to locate any claim that is not supported by a credible source.

- Anyone who has conducted research on supply chain management is aware of Stanford University Professor Hau L. Lee, who does not require any further promotion.

- If you continue to have doubts about Prof. Lee's notability, please refer to a profile of Prof. Hau Lee by The Economist back in 2002: https://www.economist.com/special-report/2002/02/02/chain-reaction He was already a foremost supply chain effort 20 years ago. Rioelesa (talk) 02:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant "supply chain expert 20 years ago"

You can see more about Prof. Hau L. Lee via https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/faculty/hau-l-lee Rioelesa (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hau L. Lee

The article Hau L. Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article, heavily relies on non-independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

This is NOT a promotional article. Prof. Hau Lee is in every supply chain textbook and his theories—particularly those related to the Bullwhip Effect—are fundamental to understanding supply chain management.

Additionally, there is no proof to support the assertion that the sources are "non-independent sources" Globalsupplychains (talk) 14:25, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Hau L. Lee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hau L. Lee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hau L. Lee

Hello, Globalsupplychains. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hau L. Lee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hau L. Lee

Hello, Globalsupplychains. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hau L. Lee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)