User talk:Gloworm747
Speedy deletion of Wise Owl Bookshop
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/32px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Wise Owl Bookshop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Wise Owl Bookshop
[edit]Wise Owl Bookshop, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Wise Owl Bookshop satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wise Owl Bookshop and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wise Owl Bookshop during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 10:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you argued against deletion on the article talk page, you should also speak up on the Articles for Deletion page Buirechain (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)