User talk:Goatart

AfD nomination of The Law of Remains[edit]

I have nominated The Law of Remains, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Law of Remains. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Niaz ^{(Talk •}^Contribs) 13:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Law of Remains[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Law of Remains, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Law of Remains. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 13:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So in order to write about this play it has to be almost medical correct?

I included the reference used to write this, Mufson's book on Reza Abdoh...

If you need page numbers for the quotes in the body of the piece I can provide those.

My only qualm is that this play needs to be exposed. A paragraph on the late Abdoh does him no justice. And writing tangible but insufficient sentences that "explain" what his play The Law of Remains is "about" would be an insult. I've simply opened it up for discussion, much like anything you could find on wikipedia about the Mayans or Aztecs. Anything pertaining to mythology, etc, these are all queries and insights, not facts, regardless of how many "references" are made. So I can't fully comprehend not allowing a rendition/opening up of his play.

Law of Remains[edit]

It appears you worked hard on that article. I would suggest first that you put this template {{construction}} on the top of the article. Then wikify it by taking out original research and adding references and third-party verifications. Cheers!--Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 20:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]