User talk:Goldsztajn/Archives/2019/June
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Goldsztajn. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
All Nepal Trade Union Federation moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, All Nepal Trade Union Federation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Viztor (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
@Goldsztajn: You can not put unreferenced article in the main space, just cite some sources. Viztor (talk) 16:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Viztor:Of course one can, read WP:WHYCITE and please WP:UCS--Goldsztajn (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't agree with you, but given you've added a reference, I guess it's cool with me. However, I highly recommend adding sources while creating an article, it makes other editors' and readers' life easier. Thanks for cooperating. Viztor (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Viztor:You don't need to agree with me - "sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged". The page you moved to draftspace left a redirect hanging. If you are trying to encourage cooperation, rather than moving pages that people are working on, it would have been far more helpful to edit the article or add sources you thought appropriate.--Goldsztajn (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- You miss the point, the problem when you create an article without any citation is it is impossible for other editors to verify the eligibility of the article, without doing extensive research, which you probably have it at your hand. Viztor (talk) 16:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- No point has been missed. The article was not a new article, it was the result of a move...and please use common sense; referencing is for material that is likely to be challenged...the existence of a trade union in Nepal is not a contentious issue.--Goldsztajn (talk) 19:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- You miss the point, the problem when you create an article without any citation is it is impossible for other editors to verify the eligibility of the article, without doing extensive research, which you probably have it at your hand. Viztor (talk) 16:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Viztor:You don't need to agree with me - "sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged". The page you moved to draftspace left a redirect hanging. If you are trying to encourage cooperation, rather than moving pages that people are working on, it would have been far more helpful to edit the article or add sources you thought appropriate.--Goldsztajn (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't agree with you, but given you've added a reference, I guess it's cool with me. However, I highly recommend adding sources while creating an article, it makes other editors' and readers' life easier. Thanks for cooperating. Viztor (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi
Many thanks, same, --Soman (talk) 17:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:NTUC-I-flag.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NTUC-I-flag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Terrorism wing of Pakistan army
Pls discuss before reverting changes on talk page of the article Talk:Pakistan_Armed_Forces#Terrorism_wing_of_pakistan_army Selfprjectiontube (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Selfprjectiontube: Your edits violate WP:NPOV and WP:MoS. If you wish to add material regarding the PAF and terrorism it must contain specific references. A statement that there is a wing of non-uniformed soldiers (what is it called? what evidence is there that it exists?) with no references will continue to be removed. The article Pakistan and state-sponsored terrorism does not contain mention of a "wing" inside the armed forces. --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:37, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
replied on the article page, pls respond on the talk page of article so that views of others can also be incorporated. Talk:Pakistan_Armed_Forces#Terrorism_wing_of_pakistan_army Selfprjectiontube (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
|
The Reviewer's Barnstar | |
| This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing articles under pending changes protection. Thank you PATH SLOPU 14:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Air Loyauté
Hello Goldsztajn,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Air Loyauté for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.