User talk:Gpshshdhe

Dream face photo

The problem with the photo is that:

You upload the photo to Wikimedia Commons, a website that delete inmediately non-free photos with the fair use argument. The non-free photos like this or this are uploaded in the local English Wikipedia servers, not in Wikimedia Commons. But in the non-free photos for biographies cases (like Dream case)...
The non-free photos of persons (like this or this) are uploaded in two cases:

When the person of the photo is deceased, or
When take photos to the person is practically impossible for very specific reasons.

In this case, I suggest you ask if this photo could be acceptable for his usage clicking here. Sr. Knowthing ¿señor? 17:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not upload it Gpshshdhe (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sykkuno notability

Hello,

You recently reverted the notability template that I added to Sykkuno. I left the following message when adding the template: "Added tentative notability template for the following reasons: a lack of significant coverage from mainstream media (Dexerto was not deemed a valid source in another similar article), and a lack of any projects/collaborations done that would warrant an article. If he continues to grow and more coverage is given, then this template should be removed. Otherwise, it seems that WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NRV are applicable here."

While removing notability templates can and should be done when possible, the reasoning you gave as for its removal failed to address either of the core issues that I brought up when creating it. The principle reasoning beyond why I added the template was per WP:SUSTAINED, which discusses the idea that someone becoming notable in an extremely short period of time (like Sykkuno) does not justify an article themselves until they've shown sustained coverage over a significant period of time. WP:NRV and the lack of significant mainstream coverage should be self-explanatory here.

There are situations wherein a person can bypass either of these restrictions; this is usually done through popularity in another medium. The best examples I'd give come from people very much related with Sykkuno: the only reason Corpse Husband or Ludwig Ahgren merit articles is because they've both released music that has done decently well (Corpse's song E-Girls Are Ruining My Life even has its own article). Fuslie merits an article as she has raised significant money for charities and is an established personality on Twitch.

In addition, subscriber count on a platform does not solely cause someone to deserve an article. About half of the top 10 most subscribed Twitch channels currently don't have articles, and don't need them.

In the future, feel free to remove the template if you feel these issues have been addressed, but until that time, it should remain. Hope this helps clarify things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haydenaa (talk • contribs) 03:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]