User talk:Gracelyn 36/sandbox

Evaluating an article

     In the article, "Fast Food," they stated that fast food was created for a "commercial resale." It all about the "speed of service" with the additional quality. This article was neutral in the fact that it told the conveniences of fast food, as well as the down sides. There wasn't any biased information in this article and it seemed to be very informed on both of the positives and negatives. However, this article did not have as many citations as was needed for the facts provided. Gracelyn 36 (talk) 17:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review (Cayman Simpson) good content so far, try and find some more content from your article to improve. Caymansimpson11 (talk) 12:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Cayman Simpson[reply]

Peer Review If you're using the exact words then either use quotations or summarize what you have found. Other then that it has good information and sources. Frich25 (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Feedback

Gracelyn, you've found some interesting information, but it doesn't necessarily fit together. You'll need to figure out where to put each piece into the existing WP article and might need to explain or introduce each fact more fully when you're ready to upload to the mainspace. JAirhart 20:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC) P.S. Take Faith's suggestion seriously, too. If WP detects plagiarism, they will notify me, and you will receive a zero for the project. Be careful when summarizing.JAirhart 20:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airhartcomp (talk • contribs)