User talk:Grand'mere Eugene/Archives/2023/April
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Grand'mere Eugene. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks... again!
Thanks (again!) for your help at Bailey's Taproom. I can barely keep up with the AfD noms lately. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:35, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for weighing in here. There are similar discussions at Talk:Acadia: A New Orleans Bistro and Talk:Yonder (restaurant), if you're interested. Not sure why this editor is so determined to disrupt. Also, let me know whenever you're ready for me to co-nominate Bit House Saloon for GA status. No rush, but I'm happy to start the process at a time that works for you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm still dealing with nonsense at Talk:Acadia: A New Orleans Bistro and Talk:Zach's Shack (editor seems to think every single source used must demonstrate in-depth coverage?), but I'm glad we are finally co-nominating Bit House Saloon. Looking forward! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello again! No pressure whatsoever, but I'm curious if you might have any interest in co-nominating the Cathy Whims article for GA status, per my comment at Talk:Cathy Whims. I'm sure a few improvements could be made, but I'd like to think the article is generally thorough and close to meeting GA criteria. If not interest, no worries! Happy editing, ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Another Believer, Yes, it looks like it needs some expansion for depth. I'll have time this weekend (at Florence — yay! beach time in winter!) to look into it. I briefly checked EBSCO and ProQuest, and it looks like some sources there not already used in the WP article. Any ideas on finding a portrait for the infobox? — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Great! (Shhh, don't tell anyone, but I'm also wintering somewhere warm for a while!) I very much welcome article improvements. After you do a bit of research and make your preferred changes, let me know if you'd like to co-nom and I'll be happy to initiate again. I've been unable to find any freely-licensed images, but that shouldn't prevent GA status. Hopefully one can be added eventually. Enjoy the beach! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Update: Another editor added an image, per my request at WikiProject Women in Red. Progress! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Another Believer, I was just surprised that Rater's analysis was a "C" rating. I took a first pass looking at sources on EBSCO and ProQuest, finding hundreds of hits! Will sift through this week to see what looks interesting... — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 01:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- I've added a bit and rearranged a bit. I just used Rater, and it qualifies as a "B" class article, so I thnik it's good to go for GA status. Thanks for the opportunity to participate with you again. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 04:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks for your help here. I will nominate ASAP. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Congrats on the for Cathy Whims! Was fun working together again. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Great! Thanks for your help here. I will nominate ASAP. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Update: Another editor added an image, per my request at WikiProject Women in Red. Progress! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Great! (Shhh, don't tell anyone, but I'm also wintering somewhere warm for a while!) I very much welcome article improvements. After you do a bit of research and make your preferred changes, let me know if you'd like to co-nom and I'll be happy to initiate again. I've been unable to find any freely-licensed images, but that shouldn't prevent GA status. Hopefully one can be added eventually. Enjoy the beach! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)