User talk:HaeB/Short BLP controversy sections

HaeB: thanks again for your effort. Any chance of a rerun? (Maybe exclude "career" if possible?) –xeno^talk 02:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Xeno: Happy to (running it again should be little work unless there is some unforeseen issue). Excluding "career" should be easy.

Any other search terms we should consider including while we're at it; say "scandal", "racist", "sexual", "drug", or "drunk"?

Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HaeB: Yes please - those are good additions to look at! Schazjmd any other suggests? –xeno^talk 10:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None come to mind, xeno. It'll be interesting to see the new results. Schazjmd (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Xeno and Schazjmd: Updated - let me know how it goes.

By the way, it might also be fairly easy to restrict the search to sections without <ref>... citations. Regards, HaeB (talk) 04:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HaeB Might be useful as a dividing criteria, to more quickly highlight the BLP violations. –xeno^talk 17:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @HaeB:! I'll start on these today. Schazjmd (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me too. This one's unique, look at that External links section. –xeno^talk 17:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, I've never seen anything like that before! Schazjmd (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fun how adding "scandal" picked up so many romance novelists.

Schazjmd (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scandalous! –xeno^talk 17:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done with my review. I guesstimate I modified around 1/3 of the articles. Thanks, HaeB! Schazjmd (talk) 17:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]