User talk:Ham and jelly butter

Please do not make bad faith AfD nominations of articles such as George W. Bush. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 21:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how is it bad faith?--Ham and jelly butter 21:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems that way. If you honestly believe what you wrote in that AfD nomination, take it to the talk page and attempt to achieve concensus. WP:SNOWBALL- The article would obviously fail the deletion process, so please do not put it through the deletion process. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 21:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop advertising the AfD on people's user pages. I can assure you that it would fail. Infact, you've already garnered one Speedy Keep vote. Please don't do this. Suggesting changes on the Talk:George W. Bush page is more productive and stands more chance of actually accomplishing something. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 22:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop advertising this AfD on usertalk pages. This is not a productive way to go about what you are trying to accomplish. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 22:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll stop--Ham and jelly butter 22:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll unblock you. AnnH ♫ 22:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

like your style

I don't know who you are, but I like your style, and recognize your notif list. Let's collaborate some time. Morton devonshire 01:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)

You are invited to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! Morton devonshire 21:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

block

You've been temporarily blocked for trolling and vandalism re: George W. Bush and George W. Bush military service controversy. -- Curps 19:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

there's no vandalism and no trolling, your bot must be broken, all i did was start a NPOV rewrite of the GWB article, which your screwy bot BLANKED before i could complete, making it LOOK like i was blanking it--Ham and jelly butter 19:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What bot are you talking about? And how can a bot possibly change your edit? Stop making excuses- regardless of your intentions, you should have known better than to remove a giant chunk of text (practically all the article, infact) from a high-view page like George W. Bush. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 19:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked by me manually, not by a bot. The GWB article was not blanked, it was simply reverted to the prior (very much non-blank) version. Your edit removed most of the content from George W. Bush and your edit summary was misleading. Also your proposed AfD for the military service controversy was trolling. Also, back on April 26 you were blocked by another admin for nominating George W. Bush for deletion. No nonsense please. -- Curps 20:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not put stuff that is offensive to socialists on your userpage (I am actually a socialist myself) Jonathan235 23:06, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for an indefinate amount of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

Paul Cyr 00:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC) (I didn't block him/her, I'm just placing the notice)[reply]

warning tags

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Nandesuka 00:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate warnings

Warnings such as the one you gave User:68.95.117.104 are inappropriate - his contribution was not nonsense. Inappropriate warnings can be considered harassment. Please desist from them. Phil Sandifer 00:39, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate minor edit marking

Remember to mark your edits as minor only when they genuinely are (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'." Paul Cyr 00:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOur vote is stupid. Leave my user page alone, and dont try sockpuppets I have friends who will watch my back , and you are ignorant. Just leave us alone. Your stuff does not have a place on WIkiworld. User:Valento

User is blocked indefinitely, no need for these comments, really. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 16:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]