User talk:Hararararra

April 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Erik Worksop was not vandalism from me but from the others. It is in Nottinghamshire. Hararararra (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hararararra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not sufficiently warned. My edit to Worksop was constructive but seemed to be the bulk of the issue.

Decline reason:

The disruptive edits in question were introduced here by an IP editor. It is apparent that you were attempting to undo that disruption, which was misinterpreted as vandalism. Perhaps if you'd used a more helpful edit summary instead of "I randomly changed stuff" then others would have been immediately aware of what you were doing. However, the proper approach was not to vandalize other articles in retaliation (including some content that I have had to redact) and then, after you were properly blocked for that, ostensibly create another account to back yourself up. Were it just the misunderstanding at play here, things would be different, but given the subsequent disruption, this block appears justified. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kinu Yeah for 31 hours or so maybe, but to be in effect nine years from now? Come on!!!! Hararararra (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you had been blocked for 31 hours or so, it would have been escalated to indefinite as soon as checkuser uncovered your sock account as well as the original IP edit. And before you attempt to deny it, checkuser uses many features of the accounts to establish that they are the same user, such as geographic location, IP address and even down to the processor and its (unique) serial number in your PC or device. 81.129.194.183 (talk) 12:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to protect this page itself from people blankng parts that I approve. Hararararra (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not going to happen. You are approving of something that you yourself added using a sock account. Deletion of sock puppet postings is not only entirely acceptable but encouraged. 81.129.194.183 (talk) 12:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]