User talk:HautmanBrittles

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of HarveyCarter (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Talk:Gordon_Brown

Please take care with your comments there, as Brown is a living person and comments that are defamatory are not allowed for good reason, please provide citations and limit your comments to something that perhaps would be of value to the article. Off2riorob (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take more care to protect living people from slanderous accusations, please consider toneing down your comment abd providing a citation to support it. Off2riorob (talk) 14:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Gordon Brown. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Bob Ainsworth. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Bob Ainsworth, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Off2riorob (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was not an attack, I am just telling you what everybody says about him.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HautmanBrittles (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the hell? I don't know what's happened here?

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 20:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.