User talk:HaywardMusic

Speedy deletion nomination of Compass Labs

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Compass Labs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Compass Labs and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional notes on the article

Got your message, thanks. One thing of note that is important is this: get away from what Compas does as a sign of importance or notability. What we look for, generally speaking, is going to be notability, and in this case, this link will particularly apply. (In a nutshell: is their third-party coverage about the corporation that is not, say, press releases?) In addition, review our verifiability and reliable sources guidelines to get an idea of what we're looking for.

I should point out that I used the "spam" rationale based on the article's language. It does feel kind of like an advertisement, and that's really not a good thing. It's definitely not peacockish, but it does feel like a plug, and that doesn't tend to do well here. If you can revise it (unless you're directly connected to them, in which case, you might want to avoid that), you'll possibly have a win. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:58, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to give you the pointers. =) One thing to note about deletion: it isn't permanent, necessarily, except in extreme cases. For this, I am going to point you to WP:USERFY - this is for when you want to take control of an article to work with it in your user space until you can get it to a point where it's suitable to Wikipedia, and then move it into the article space accordingly. So in short, an admin can undelete and move an article for you to work on in the background without risking getting it nuked again. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 16:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]