User talk:Hereticus obstinatus

Welcome!

Hello, Hereticus obstinatus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 23:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NGO Monitor

imho, while your edit was correct in the Electronic Intifada article by removing the words 'hate site', you were wrong to call NGO Monitor "far from an objective, let alone reliable source". NGO Monitor is 100% reliable. the issue sometimes with NGO Monitor is that much of what they do is original research and not third-party. please be aware of the difference.

And your edit on the NGO Monitor page itself needed a tweek as well. fyi. Soosim (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit on the NGO Monitor page is far too detailed for me to judge its validity, so I'll gladly leave that to other Wikipedians. However, the Reception part of the lemma clearly suggests that NGO Monitor is far from an objective and/or reliable source. Hereticus obstinatus (talk) 19:10, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Regarding your edit here, would you mind making sure that it's obvious what sources support those statements? Thanks. Samsara 01:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source is the 2006 documentary that sparked the Dutch citizenship controversy, De heilige Ayaan (Saint Ayaan). I've added an additional, updated reference. Hereticus obstinatus (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hereticus obstinatus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]