User talk:Hhyuna25/sandbox

Week 1

1. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? -Yes. Each fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. 2. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? -The article tries to flow well, but not everything in the article is relevant to the article. 3. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? -Not all parts of the articles seems neutral. There are more information for certain groups of community development examples. 4. Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -The information is coming from journals and community development websites. 5. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? -The citations do work. Some of the claims do not have citations and need them to provide evidence. 6. Check the "talk" page of the article - what is the Wikipedia community saying about how to present this topic? How is the article rated in terms of Wikipedia's quality scale? -There are talks about merging and adding information.

Hhyuna25 (talk) 08:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)hannah25[reply]

Week 2

Rural flight vs community development article

For your new article, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):

1. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? -Most of the facts referred in the article are journals or newspaper articles. 2. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? 3. Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? -There are many subheadings for the topic. Some of them have a lot of information, while some of them are just filled with links. 4. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? -Some of the citations do not work anymore. Alot of the information is outdated. 5. Check the "talk" page of the article - what is the Wikipedia community saying about how to present this topic? How is the article rated in terms of Wikipedia's quality scale? -There are talks about merging certain articles together. There are also talk about adding more to certain subheadings. 6. What sections in this article are different than in the Community Development article? What new information or different information is presented in the two? -Both articles have small topics within the broad article. The only difference would be that some of the topics had alot of broad contributions. 7. Choose at least 2 questions relevant to the article you're evaluating. Leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Hhyuna25 (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC). -added to rural flight article[reply]

Add to an article -added to the community development article

Week 3

Topic: Homeboy Industries

I plan to add a description about the structure of the company (social business-social Enterprise). I am also adding bits of information to the subtopics.

Bibliography Gibson-Graham, J.K., Jenny Cameron and Stephen Healy.

   2013. Take back the economy: an ethical guide for 
   transforming our communities. Minneapolis: University 
   of Minnesota Press.

Homeboy Industries. (2017). Homeboy Industries Main Page.

   Retrieved from http://www.homeboyindustries.org/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhyuna25 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4-8 Draft Article

A distinctive aspect of Homeboy Industries is its structure of a multifaceted social enterprise and social business. This helps young people who were former gang members and former inmates to have an opportunity to learn job skills and seek employment.

History In 2014, the Global Homeboy Network was founded to work with other organizations to provide similar programs and the social enterprise employment structure across the globe. Father Father Greg hopes organizations will not duplicate Homeboy Industries, but seek to creating a community and a place of welcome to those in trouble.

Funding -According to its annual budget, Homeboy Industries receives government support from the Department of Labor and the City of L.A.’s Gang Reduction Youth Development program. The nonprofit also receives donations from corporations and individuals to fund trainee compensation, programs, fundraising, administration and businesses. The annual budget is around $14.7 million dollars, where 25% of the revenue is utilized to sustain all the free services and programs for young adults who have recently left prison. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhyuna25 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]