User talk:HistoryBuff1983

Welcome

Hello, HistoryBuff1983, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 05:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism

Hi Historybuff1983, and welcome to Wikipedia. You contributed Progressive Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism. Someone has nominate it for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism. Thanks, IZAK 12:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Progressive Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism at AfD

Hi... Evidently it was bad form of me to have nominated an article you originated for deletion without notifying you directly. That was my mistake: I didn't know I was supposed to do that. My apologies.

I want to take the opportunity to stress that my nominating the article for deletion was not at all intended as a reflection on the quality of the article or an attempt to slight your work. Rather, I felt and feel that the subject does not meet the notability guidelines which are the threshold for inclusion, or the proposed guidelines at WP:NOTNEWS. In short, I feel that the reasons marshalled in favour of inclusion reflect a tendency some Wikipedians have dubbed recentism, a phenomenon which results, in my view, from a rampant confusion between notabililty and newsworthiness. I've made this case at greater length on the deletion discussion page. --Rrburke^(talk) 19:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request help...

Hi,

Almost all of the pages you categorised are already organised using templates related to specific campaigns etc., so there is no need to create new categories. I will be attaching categories to the templates to ensure that they are all gotten, as well as finishing to clean them up. Tewfik^Talk 05:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to dramatically reorganise these pages, I suggest that you first open a discussion on the Wikipedia:Notice board for Israel-related topics. Tewfik^Talk 05:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You probably didn't notice, but most of them are redundant to already existent categories ie Category:2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. I think that Category:Military operations involving Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is good though, sinc ethe main cat is overpopulated, and I'm only going to rename it to fit with the standard convention. Your intention was a good one, but you can save a lot of work with a little more investigation next time :-) Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 05:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you were adding a lot of villages to Category:Cities in the West Bank. Make sure that they go to Category:Towns and villages in the Palestinian territories, Category:Palestinian refugee camps in the Gaza Strip, or Category:Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank instead. Tewfik^Talk 06:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are already engaging in all this categorising, you may want to create Category:Towns and villages in the West Bank and Category:Towns and villages in the Gaza Strip. Tewfik^Talk 07:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another point: if you create a sub-categorisation (as in Category:Palestinian refugees), it is only really helpful if you remove its members from the categories you put it in (like so), thus depopulating the first tier of the super-category. Tewfik^Talk 06:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]