User talk:Ichthus77
98.238.10.144--
On graded absolutism you said "Explicitly violates Wikipedia's neutrality policy by endorsing a view; lack of citations for several sections (Moreover, the terms used are not standard to moral theory). Do NOT revert."
I revised the article after your first edit, so that it would not endorse a view. This moral theory, as it applies to standard moral theory, uses terms standard to standard moral theory. However, it also originates from Christian philosophy and thus uses terms relevant in Christian philosophy. If you remove those terms, it is no longer about graded absolutism. Standard moral theory, and Christian philosophy are not distinct. I cannot provide citations after every sentence and appropriate citations have been given for my sources. Thankyou for adding the "further reading" by the way. Will you please stop butchering the article and speaking to me in all caps? Rather than scrapping whole sections, why don't you note areas where you think citations (or whatever) are needed? If you think this can be approached in a different way, build up the article rather than destroying it.
Respectfully,
Start a discussion with Ichthus77
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Ichthus77. What you say here will be public for others to see.
