User talk:Ikemmpineiro2014/sandbox

Article Evaluation

The Wikipedia page I chose was Polar Cell. I personally believe that the Wikipedia page for a pole cell is awful. It consists of 3 sentences and only has 1 source cited. It is on topic with what it is about, however, there is not enough information given about it. Nothing was distracting about the article. There isn't enough information on it, I do not believe that it was heavily biased. It is underrepresented in the sense that there isn't a whole lot of information about the topic. The 1 source that is listed is legitimate and offers information about the topic. Definitely, believe that there is more to the subject than what is shown. People who have contributed to this Wikipedia page also agree that the subject is too vague and has minimal material. The article is rated as low-importance, and has been apart of the WikiProject Biology. It differs on how we have talked about it in class because you have provided us with more background on the topic, and had visuals.

Invagination

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invagination

I do not like how this particular Wikipedia page flows, which is what I would like to fix during this process of editing. The introduction is a bit bland and this is what I would add.

There is more than one type of cell movement for invagination. Two common types are axial and orthogonal. The difference between the two is how the production of the tube is formed in the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix. Axial can be formed at a single point along the axis of a surface. Orthogonal is linear and trough.

Source: Jamie A. Davies, in Mechanisms of Morphogenesis (Second Edition), 2013