User talk:Iloveashlynn
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ashlynn may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -- JoanneB 17:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- I've deleted the article again, please don't recreate it. Thanks! --JoanneB 17:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, sorry, Wikipedia is not for love declarations, it's an online Wikipedia. You can, for instance, create it at User:Iloveashlynn/Ashlynn, it will probably be deleted then too, but not as fast as when you create it as an encyclopedia article, which it isn't. --JoanneB 17:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Pretiest girl in the world, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cyrus Andiron 12:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
The pages you've been creating
[edit]Apparently you didn't get my point above and on my talk page, or you simply didn't want to get it. I've blocked your account, as the only things you have done were create non-encyclopedic pages in places where that was not allowed, which we consider vandalism. If you had made any constructive edits, you'd get a warning, another chance and all that, but I think you've made your intentions here pretty clear, and Wikipedia is not the place for those intentions. --JoanneB 16:02, 23 May 2007 (UTC)