User talk:It4pune

Speedy deletion nomination of User:It4pune/Perennial Systems

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on User:It4pune/Perennial Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of User:It4pune/Perennial Systems and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix_talk 08:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with User:It4pune/Perennial Systems. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. In addition, please note that for a subject to warrant a Wikipedia article, it must be notable. The use of the word "upcoming" usually implies that the subject is not yet notable, but the person using the word thinks it will be soon, which is not enough: the subject must already be notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), that ought to help you to decide how to provide sourcing and the language to use when writing about an organization to show its notability. Corvus cornix_talk 18:49, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]