User talk:JGossard

Welcome

Hello, JGossard, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (talk) 20:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

Please provide edit summaries when you edit. I've just reverted a whole series of edits in the article for Leverage and its accompanying episode article, largely because they have no edit summaries, and thereby there is not rationale for the changes. At times, it's not hard to figure out what your reasons are, but without justifying edits by using edit summaries, you open yourself up to being reverted solely because there is no summary. I scanned through your edit history, and you have yet to provide an edit summary for an edit you've made.

I've also reverted, again, your factually inaccurate edit stating Nate will be returned to prison if he fails to find Damien Moreau. It was quite clear in the first episode of the season, and has been stressed in interviews with the writers and producers since, that Nate will be imprisoned in Italy should he fail. The Italian's exact dialogue was: "You come stay in my prisoner room, thick walls a thousand years old. And we still use chains for such a bad man." She then goes on to explain the remainder of the team would be killed. Please be careful when you're editing that you're accurate, particularly after you're reverted for inaccuracy. Drmargi (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your erroneous edit again. Please check your facts before editing, and provide edit summaries so other editors will know why you've made the edits you did! Drmargi (talk) 08:14, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Drmargi (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your erroneous edit to List of Leverage episodes has been reverted yet again. I'm not sure what the problem is, but you have been shown, using dialogue from the show, that your edit is WRONG. Please do not persist in adding content that is WRONG. Drmargi (talk) 07:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Your addition to Private Practice (season 4) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from press release, available at: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings/20110125abc03/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

90210

Please stop reverting certain things to the 90210 summary. Naomi isn't pregnant and Teddy is a guest star. Jayy008 (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JGossard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JGossard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]